vaneramos: (Default)
[personal profile] vaneramos


The flock of house sparrows that haunts Florence Lane is restless, too.

Sometime around Groundhog Day I always get hit with a surge of energy. I felt warning rumbles last week, but it arrived full blast when I got out of bed yesterday. It results from increasing daylight. First thing in the morning I want to bake banana muffins instead of huddling in front of my computer screen. My libido increases. I long to dig my fingers into soft earth and see green things grow. My concentration and self-confidence improve. I am less disposed to sadness and complacency, more inclined toward impatience and dissatisfaction. It is disconcerting, but now that I understand the cycle, it comes as a relief.

It emphasizes how sluggish I have felt since October. I resist calling this a disorder. It's entirely natural. The change of seasons affects the behaviour of practically every animal that lives in these latitudes. Why not humans? If Western society could accommodate it, perhaps it wouldn't make so many people unhappy. How I shall shape my career around it is another question.

A few days of temperatures around freezing have drawn a golden blush into the twigs of the old black willows. The maples remain demurely grey.

In honour of changing my user name to [livejournal.com profile] vaneramos, here is a new image of the Eramosa River.









Me and my river. It's still asleep, but I am awake.

Date: 2004-02-06 03:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leafshimmer.livejournal.com
These are gorgeous, and so are you. :)

Sounds like you are feeling the flow of what I call the Imbolc/Brighid energy! Glad you are enjoying it. Banana muffins is definitely the way to go.

hugs, Shimmer

Re:

Date: 2004-02-06 05:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vaneramos.livejournal.com
Skeptic naturalist that I am, I would deconstruct it to daylight stimulating the hypothalamus, triggering a shift of hormones and neurotransmitters, but yes, we're talking about the same thing. ;-P

Have one of my muffins.

xo

Date: 2004-02-06 03:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poetbear.livejournal.com
you realize that look quite a bit like
Ron Howard, don't you?~paul

Re:

Date: 2004-02-06 05:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vaneramos.livejournal.com
*covering face* I didn't know who he was, but looking him up, I can't really see the resemblance. Of course I can't find a picture of him with a beard, and you haven't seen me without one.

Re:

Date: 2004-02-06 08:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poetbear.livejournal.com
he always grows his bears on 'shoots'.
he started as a child actor, but directs
now. and his hair isn't colored like yours.
plus, i've never seen as closup a
shot of him as i have you, so i could
be wrong.~paul

Date: 2004-02-06 04:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dakoopst.livejournal.com
*nods* Certainly not a disorder at all.

With the coming of new life in the world comes new life in our hearts. We cannot help, when we are surrounded by the beginnings of so much life force, to feel it well up inside us. We cannot help but be buoyed by the promise of spring.

I can't wait until it's fully here.

Re:

Date: 2004-02-06 08:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vaneramos.livejournal.com
Maybe I can just send all this snow down to you for a couple weeks so you can have a real winter and I can get it over with. :-)

Date: 2004-02-06 05:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mattycub.livejournal.com
With the modern conviences of electric light, heat, and air conditioning allowing us to mostly carry on about our business regardless of what hour of the day or time of the year it is, I think we've forgotten that the changing of the seasons affects us on a fairly basic level. We like to think that we've conquered nature, but it's not really true. I still has it's hold on us, rather or not we choose to acknowledge it.

Unrelated: you have a very strong, handsome profile.

Re:

Date: 2004-02-06 08:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vaneramos.livejournal.com
Thank you. You wouldn't have seen this image (friends only), which also shows my profile (it's g-rated, but might not be considered work safe).

Hugs.

Re:

Date: 2004-02-07 07:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rsc.livejournal.com
it's g-rated

Maybe in Canada. Around here, the fact that you're both men would probably put it at R.

Date: 2004-02-06 05:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] art-thirst.livejournal.com
My computer had been done since Wed. night. I logged into LJ and saw "vaneramos". Who is THAT, I thought.... oh wait, Van. Sly devil. :-)

Re:

Date: 2004-02-06 08:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vaneramos.livejournal.com
Yes, I'm up to some tricks.

Date: 2004-02-06 06:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rsc.livejournal.com
That first river picture is another hauntingly beautiful shot.

You should put together a collection of Reflections in the Eramosa.

Re:

Date: 2004-02-06 08:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vaneramos.livejournal.com
I certainly intend to put together some more handmade albums like the ones I made for my daughters for Christmas.

Date: 2004-02-07 05:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] themonkeybear.livejournal.com
I can't take my eyes off that first image.

Re:

Date: 2004-02-07 11:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vaneramos.livejournal.com
Thanks. I like it a lot. It's funny how a "bad" picture can work so well.

Date: 2004-02-07 11:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] queenmomcat.livejournal.com
On a clean note, I rather like the blurring wings of the house sparrows in the first photograph above. In a photo of less swift creatures, it might be a flaw but I've always thought that photos taken at speeds high enough to completely freeze the birds' flight didn't do them justice. Birds just don't /sit/ still.

On possibly un-work-safe photos you've linked to in the comments section: I rather like that too (from an artistic standpoint, although I have to admit it does fall into that vast gray area that so upsets U.S. Customs (the government arm) and customs (culture of far too much of the country).

Re:

Date: 2004-02-07 12:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vaneramos.livejournal.com
That's offensive, considering that similar heterosexual images are widely displayed in advertising and so on.

I like the birds' motion, too. I moved to follow them, so the landscape is even more indistinct.

humbly apologetic explanation

Date: 2004-02-07 12:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] queenmomcat.livejournal.com
Just to clarify: without going into a political tirade in someone else's journal.../I'm/ not offended in any way by a gorgeous photograph of two people in an intimate embrace, regardless of who's doing the embracing. (Growing up in San Francisco does that to one.) I cannot understand or condone those who DO find such things offensive. Post more, please!

Re: humbly apologetic explanation

Date: 2004-02-07 12:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vaneramos.livejournal.com
Oh no, your comment didn't offend me. It's the double standard of US government policy that disgusts.
Page generated Jan. 13th, 2026 07:38 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios