These are both beautiful. The second one tickles me because it's not the kind of subject I normally associate with haiku (although I don't know why not).
May I pick a nit? Is the second line of the first one supposed to start "in pursuit"?
No. A haiku is by definition comprised of sentence fragments. There are many rules, and a writer must pick and choose. But one of the most important is to avoid a single run-on sentence. There is supposed to be a syntactical break at the end of the first or second line. In both of these I placed it at the end of the first. Still, your nit demonstrates that the division is not as clear as it should be, perhaps.
The truck is an unusual element, but the image pointed toward traditional themes of haiku, so I decided to experiment.
My supposition was based not on grammatical considerations, but rather on my impression, perhaps incorrect, that the second line was supposed to contain 7 syllables, or at least that the whole thing should contain 17.
As a general guideline, yes, although a lesson I read on tanka said Chinese syllables are shorter than English ones, so it may be appropriate to use less than 17. I chose to count "field" as two syllables.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-12 08:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-13 12:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-12 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-13 12:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-13 01:20 am (UTC)May I pick a nit? Is the second line of the first one supposed to start "in pursuit"?
no subject
Date: 2006-01-13 02:42 am (UTC)The truck is an unusual element, but the image pointed toward traditional themes of haiku, so I decided to experiment.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-13 04:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-15 01:36 am (UTC)