Progressive photo journal
Apr. 24th, 2003 02:46 pmPoor observation skills are a downfall for a writer. Sensory detail is the currency of good writing. Action and detail are the tools writers use to create vivid imagery, the thing that grabs hold of our minds and makes us want to read more. Here are some sensory details in my friends' journals that grabbed my attention recently:
rjwolfx watching milk and coffee blend together in his cup.
anoisblue's husband,
kenhighcountry, pulling her against him and kissing her in a parking alcove.
q_knox watching a daddy-long-legs struggle in the bathtub.
ruralrob hearing the nightly noise of frogs in his pond.
I need to emerge from my navel and find ways of getting back in touch with the rest of my body, my sense organs in particular.
Then I saw an excellent idea by
This was a beautiful morning, so I decided to create a progressive photo journal of a walk along the Eramosa River. I started at my front door and took a photo every 30 paces. Unfortunately the camera ran out of memory after 36 images, otherwise I would have gone further.
On my geocities web site, Silvan's Glade, I used the 36 images to create a gallery which you can view here. The small images can't be enlarged, but in this LJ entry I have posted larger versions of two images which I found particularly interesting.
I used most of the pictures to record the actual path of my journey. But when something off to the side captured my attention I didn't hesitate to shoot it, like the blue car in image 9 or the picturesque tree trunk in image 35 (enlarged at top of this page). This resulted in a large number of uniform pictures and a few eccentric ones.
- The first 12 images of Kingsmill Ave. are remarkably uniform, then the landscape changes dramatically as I enter the river park. The last 24 images are, again, quite uniform.
- I'm nervous of photographing strangers. This is a ridiculous hangup. What will they do to me? When I saw a woman walking her dog, I resisted my phobia and shot the picture (image 21, at right).
- A single black willow dominates the park. It first appears as an indistinct blot, apparently at the end of the trail, in image 14. It reappears later, in image 21 (at right) and overshadows the next few scenes until I pass it in image 25. This single, dramatic tree is the kind of feature that adds remarkable beauty to an otherwise unexciting landscape.
- The next most obvious feature of this landscape is a factory. It is visible in eight of the original pictures, although the scale makes it too small to be seen in a couple of the gallery images. Droning sounds from the factory are also omnipresent. And yet I tend to close that human contruction out of my awareness whenever I walk through the park.
Overall it was an interesting exercise that made me review the way I see things.
no subject
Date: 2003-04-24 12:12 pm (UTC)I also like the controlled nature of your little experiment. I once coerced a bunch of LJ friends to take pictures of the view from the front of their house - looking right to introduce a bit of uniformity in to the exercise. The results were fascinating.
no subject
Date: 2003-04-24 03:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-04-24 05:32 pm (UTC)It is very hard I have to say.
Believe me, I understand. I had some terrible times, afraid I would lose my daughters altogether. Things are much better now.
Nice blue eyes behind those glasses, mister!
By the way, I sing in a GALA chorus. Guelph (pop. 95,000) is the smallest city in Canada with its own gay and lesbian choir, 38 voices. Our spring concert is this Saturday.
Re:
Date: 2003-04-24 08:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-04-24 04:20 pm (UTC)Phyllis Atwater has written about how she acquired super observation skill as a child by hanging out with her father, a police detective. He'd quiz her on what she had noticed in various scenes, until she gained the habit of noting details...
I enjoyed the photos you posted on LJ. Looks like spring is just as far advanced there as here.
no subject
Date: 2003-04-24 04:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-04-25 07:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-04-25 02:34 pm (UTC)This is an interesting perspective. We couldn't possibly observe and remember everything around us. Such a surplus of information would overwhelm our brain capacity.
I would be interested in hearing how your experiment goes.